‘More U.K. Insanity’

“The children’s book, “Talking About Terrorism”, published weeks before the Manchester Arena atrocity, describes the indiscriminate mass murder of innocent members of the public as a

“type of war”.

“It tells primary age children that terrorists kill people because they believe they are being treated

“unfairly and not shown respect”.

“It gives examples of “terrorists” whose ideas then turn out to be right: 

“The Suffragettes used violence and were called terrorists…” it stated. {Lol…}

   “Today many people think of them as brave women and admire their struggle for the right to vote.”

“In an activity recommended for pupils aged seven to 11, teachers are urged to

“invite children to write a letter to a terrorist. If they could ask a terrorist six questions, what would they be?”

“The book, published by ‘Brilliant Publications’ and containing a foreword by Peter Wanless, the chief executive of the ‘NSPCC’ {a children’s charity}, has been slammed by critics who say it is potentially dangerous.

“Chris McGovern, chairman of the ‘Campaign for Real Education’, said the letter task would confuse and potentially upset pupils.

“He said:

   “This a crackpot idea based on the misguided notion that primary school children must engage with, and show “respect” for, religious fanatics who are seeking to kill them.

   “It is part of the “British Values” {which they’re not} agenda that is being forced on schools by ‘Ofsted’ {Government ‘Office for Standards in Education’} and the educational establishment.

   “The primary school classroom is not the place to humanise terrorism by ‘pretend dialogue’.”

“In trying to help children “understand” terrorists’ motives, the book invites sympathy for the killers, critics claim.

“And by invoking the Suffragettes and Nelson Mandela, it leads children to question whether terrorism might be justifiable…”

Pamela Geller, May 28, 2017


“A BBC investigation into “halala” — a ritual enabling a divorced Muslim woman to remarry her husband by first wedding someone else, consummating the union, and then being divorced by him — revealed that imams in Britain are not only encouraging this, but profiting financially from it. This depravity has led to many such women being held hostage, literally and figuratively, to men paid to become their second husbands.

“This ritual, which is considered a misinterpretation of Islamic sharia law even by extremist Shi’ites and Saudi-style Salafists, is practiced by certain Islamic sects, such as Hanafis, Barelvis and Deobandis. When a husband repeats the Arabic word for divorce — talaq — three times to his wife, these sects consider a Muslim marriage null and void. For such a woman to be allowed to return to the husband who banished her, she must first marry someone else — and have sex with him — before the second husband divorces her.

“These divorce rites, despite the laws of the land, are common in India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and other Asian countries, where a majority of the people belong to the Hanafi, Barelvi or Deobandi sects. Nevertheless, local seminaries, mosques and online services openly advertise and promote halala with impunity; it is accepted by society and rarely monitored by state authorities…

“…As bad as this is, there is an even darker side to the story: Under sharia law, the second husband is under no obligation to give his wife a quick divorce — allowing him to keep her as his virtual sex slave for as long as he wishes…

“If one asks how all of this jibes with British law, the answer is that it does not. But young Muslims in the UK are discouraged by their communities from marrying through the British system, and are told to have imams perform their weddings and sharia councils register their marriages. Couples who comply end up being at the mercy of Islamic authorities in family matters, including divorce…

“Had the British government addressed Sharia Council malpractice when it was first revealed, we would not be facing this pandemic today. Contrary to what apologists for this travesty say, the plight of Muslim women should be treated as an issue of human rights.

“It is time for the British government to wake up and take a tough stand on such unethical, and probably illegal, system. And the sooner the better, lest the whole sharia council system go “underground” and out of reach…

–‘Sharia Councils and Sexual Abuse in Britain’,
Khadija Khan, Gatestone Institute, April 14, 2017


Prime Minister Theresa May (Frank Augsten: AP)

“Prime Minister Theresa May, in her public statement after the Manchester blast, stated:

“We struggle to comprehend the warped and twisted mind that sees a room packed with young children not as a scene to cherish but as an opportunity for carnage…. But we can continue to resolve to thwart such attacks in future. To take on and defeat the ideology that often fuels this violence.”

May was careful to avoid naming the ideology {!}

“British politicians seem have become intoxicated by the propaganda of those who prefer to term any action to limit Islamic extremism or terrorism “Islamophobia.” When the government decides to look the other way, it allows many malpractices to flourish…

Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn (Photo: Reuters)

“‘Labour Party’ chief Jeremy Corbyn, reacting to the Manchester terror attack, did not even address any root cause, nor does his election platform contain a strong policy…

“Corbyn is, in fact, an open critic of ‘Prevent’ {Britain’s anti-terror program}; he instead suggested expanding Britain’s ‘Prevent’ strategy to all communities, so that Muslims would not think that it only referred to them.

“The ‘Prevent’ strategy, Corbyn said, is “often counter-productive” {examples?} and appears to cast suspicion on all Muslims {As it should, since their communities make no effort to turn in young terrorists}

Conservative peer, Baroness Warsi

“Conservative peer, Baroness Warsi…who served in Prime Minister David Cameroon’s Cabinet, is known for defending a hardline Dewsbury madrassah, claiming that though the faith school

“might have produced bombers, it also produced the first Muslim cabinet minister [Warsi]”. {That trade-off isn’t worth it!}

“Manchester seems to have a problem. The ‘Guardian’ reported in February 2017 that at least 16 convicted or dead terrorists have lived within 2.5 miles of the Manchester home of Ronald Fiddler, aka Jamal al-Harith, an ex-Guantanamo prisoner who blew himself up while fighting for ISIS in Syria earlier this year…

“Thanks to the handicapped ‘Prevent’ strategy, we have, to date, not seen any inquiry or action against the environment or people that might have contributed to or supported this radicalization.

“Khalid Masood, the perpetrator of the Westminster attack on March 22, did not go abroad to hone his terrorism skills; he served as a representative of the Luton Islamic Centre mosque — one institution among many that have eluded the government’s ‘Prevent’ program, due to the pressure from so-called “moderate” Muslims…”

–‘UK: Welcome Mat for Jihadists’,
Khadija Khan, Gatestone Institute, May 27, 2017


Labour Party sex-segregated meeting

See also:
Nuttiness From Great Britain{Feb.10, 2017}:

Labour should be embarrassed about holding a sex-segregated rally{May 8, 2015}: https://www.facebook.com/345805362190090/photos/a.350308008406492.1073741828.345805362190090/675637542540202/?type=3

British Girls Raped by Muslim Gangs on ‘Industrial Scale’ {March 18, 2015}: https://www.facebook.com/345805362190090/photos/a.350308008406492.1073741828.345805362190090/653546774749279/?type=3


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: